By: Paul Sarran
October 20, 2026
Politics will always attract different opinions, disagreements and passionate debates. However, there must be limits to how we treat one another when political views differ. As citizens, we must discuss leadership and governance without allowing political allegiance to destroy mutual respect.
Recently, I posted a status on social media stating, and I quote, “First to begin Rowley wasn’t suppose to be a Prime Minister….Hence the reason for the backlash and the economic and social issues at present.” The reaction was unbelievable, particularly comments made by individuals I expected would understand political debate, including a former Member of Parliament.
What disappointed me most was not that people disagreed with my opinion. Everyone is entitled to their views. Rather, it was the nature of some responses and the willingness to support comments I considered distasteful. When former public officials participate in such exchanges, it raises questions about the example being set. How can citizens trust political figures when disagreement takes precedence over respectful engagement?
The comparison that comes to mind is the recent political exchanges surrounding water supply and the Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA), including Opposition Whip Marvin Gonzales’s appearance outside Parliament with a bottle of water. The bottle became part of the public spectacle, but the larger question is whether our representatives are prepared to move beyond theatrics and engage in constructive solutions. Political communication should elevate public discussion, not reduce it to personal attacks.
My original statement was rooted in my assessment of the previous administration under former Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley, whose tenure lasted almost a decade. During that period, Trinidad and Tobago faced persistent challenges involving crime, economic pressures, public services and social development. Many citizens continue to experience these difficulties today.
It is reasonable to ask why the People’s National Movement (PNM) now criticises the current administration over problems that, in my view, could have been addressed more effectively or mitigated during its years in office. No government can solve every national problem overnight. However, nearly ten years in office provides an opportunity to strengthen institutions, implement reforms and establish policies that deliver lasting improvements. Accountability must apply to former governments as much as those currently entrusted with national leadership.
The Opposition has every right to scrutinise the United National Congress (UNC) administration. A strong opposition is essential to parliamentary democracy. However, effective opposition requires more than identifying weaknesses, criticising government decisions and undermining public confidence. It requires credible alternatives, honest reflection and a willingness to acknowledge where previous policies fell short.
The PNM must undertake serious introspection. Its internal disagreements, public controversies and questions surrounding its parliamentary representation cannot simply be brushed aside. Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles-Robinson must consider whether the party’s current approach and personnel are helping restore public confidence. Leadership sometimes requires difficult decisions, including reviewing whether those entrusted with important responsibilities continue to serve the public effectively.
This is not about demanding that every senator or parliamentarian agree with a particular political position. Independent thought and legitimate disagreement are fundamental to democracy. Political parties must demonstrate that their representatives understand the seriousness of public service and the standards expected of those who occupy positions of influence.
Meanwhile, the UNC administration, led by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, must be assessed on its performance and its ability to deliver on commitments made to citizens. The government’s crime initiatives, policy adjustments and 2026/2027 national budget have generated discussion about the country’s development priorities and future direction.
I welcome measures intended to strengthen public safety, improve service delivery and create opportunities for future generations. However, announcements and budget commitments must translate into measurable improvements in people’s lives. Citizens need safer communities, reliable public services, sustainable employment and meaningful relief from the cost of living. These are the outcomes against which the administration must be judged.
I believe the Prime Minister has demonstrated determination in pursuing the mandate presented to voters. In my assessment, her present leadership reflects lessons learned from her previous period in government. Experience provides opportunities for reflection, correction and improvement. What matters now is that the administration remains focused on implementation, transparency and ordinary citizens’ needs.
I fully endorse the Prime Minister’s efforts to move Trinidad and Tobago forward, while recognising that supporting any government should never mean abandoning accountability. Constructive criticism is not betrayal, just as political opposition should not automatically be interpreted as hostility.
The PNM cannot rebuild its credibility simply by criticising the UNC. It must demonstrate that it has learned from its time in office and can offer a convincing vision for the country’s future. If the opposition continues prioritising political confrontation over renewal, it risks strengthening the very administration it seeks to challenge.
The next election will be decided by citizens, not social media arguments or political personalities. Voters will examine performance, leadership, policies and public engagement. If the UNC continues delivering meaningful results while the PNM fails to address its shortcomings, another five-year term for the governing party becomes a genuine possibility.
(The author holds a BSc in Political Science from the University of the West Indies.)
Email your opinions, letters and commentaries to: letters@caribmagplus.com